The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) test, developed by Isabel Briggs Myers and Katharine Cook Briggs, categorizes individuals into 16 personality types based on preferences in four dichotomies. While traditionally used for employee selection, it’s increasingly employed by individuals seeking compatible friends. However, critics argue that personality is dynamic, influenced by various factors, and reducing it to fixed types risks oversimplification (Yadav, 2023; Boyle, 1995).

Despite its popularity, the MBTI’s reliance on predetermined types raises questions about its effectiveness in facilitating meaningful connections. Individuals often feel pressured to fit predefined categories, which may not accurately reflect their complexity. This trend is particularly prevalent in Asian countries, where the MBTI is widely discussed as a tool for making friends.

Therefore, the following question has been pointed out:

How can individuals foster genuine connections and meaningful relationships beyond the confines of personality types and categorizations?

To foster genuine connections beyond personality types, interventions focusing on empathy, communication, and shared values are essential. Thus, this research involved interview, practice and workshop to understand people’s communication and social preference. The intervention also encourages individuals to focus on common goals and values rather than predefined categories can enhance understanding and empathy. Training in effective communication techniques and conflict resolution equips individuals to navigate diverse social situations and build rapport. Promoting diversity and inclusion facilitates cross-cultural interactions, fostering understanding and appreciation of different perspectives.

In essence, fostering genuine connections requires moving beyond the limitations of personality categorizations and embracing the complexity and diversity of human relationships. By prioritizing empathy, communication, and shared values, individuals can cultivate meaningful connections that transcend predefined labels.

Reference:

Boyle, G.J., 1995. Myers‐Briggs type indicator (MBTI): some psychometric limitations. Australian Psychologist, 30(1), pp.71-74.

Yadav, M.H., 2023. A Study of the Effects of an Individual’s Personality and Characteristics on Job Behavior Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management, 10(3), pp.49-52.